GULFAN KHAN vs State Advocate - APO — 297/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAL010011032026
Filing Number
849/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
297/2026
Registration Date
11-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
ARAVALI VIHAR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GULFAN KHAN
Adv. GAURAV SHARMA
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - APO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case 297/2026 - Gulfan Khan v. State Advocate, APO The Session Court in Alwar granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Gulfan Khan under Section 482 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with FIR 95/2025 involving allegations of criminal conspiracy, cheating, and property fraud related to residential plot allocations. The court found that a property dispute exists between the petitioner and complainant Chandra Dev regarding plot cancellations by Multan Housing Cooperative Society in 1999, with a civil suit still pending; other co-accused received similar bail relief previously, and the 26-year delay in raising objections warranted interim protection from arrest pending investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case 297/2026 - Gulfan Khan v. State Advocate, APO The Session Court in Alwar granted anticipatory bail to petitioner Gulfan Khan under Section 482 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with FIR 95/2025 involving allegations of criminal conspiracy, cheating, and property fraud related to residential plot allocations. The court found that a property dispute exists between the petitioner and complainant Chandra Dev regarding plot cancellations by Multan Housing Cooperative Society in 1999, with a civil suit still pending; other co-accused received similar bail relief previously, and the 26-year delay in raising objections warranted interim protection from arrest pending investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts