RAJENDRA vs GRAM PANCHAYAT MALAKHERA — 29/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CIVIL APPEAL - Civil Regular Appeal

CNR: RJAL010007622016

Filing Number

580/2016

Filing Date

24-Jun-2016

Registration No

29/2016

Registration Date

27-Jun-2016

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GRAM PANCHAYAT MALAKHERA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 05/2022 (CIS No. 29/2016) Petitioner: Rajendra (son of Badri Prasad) Respondent: Gram Panchayat Malakhera The appellate court dismissed Rajendra's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his suit. Rajendra had sought a mandatory injunction requiring the Gram Panchayat to construct a shop on a disputed plot (4×5 feet) and hand it over to him as a tenant after receiving ₹10,000 as advance rent. The court found that Rajendra failed to prove his entitlement because: (1) the disputed site had electricity infrastructure and an access road obstruction making it unsuitable for construction; (2) both parties acknowledged these impediments; and (3) Rajendra provided no evidence of attempting alternative remedies or seeking refund of the deposited amount, undermining his claim of genuine prejudice from the Panchayat's alleged breach of promise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  8. 28-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  9. 19-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  11. 12-Jan-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  12. 13-Oct-2025

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  13. 06-Aug-2025

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  14. 30-Apr-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  15. 05-Feb-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  16. 13-Nov-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  17. 21-Aug-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  18. 20-May-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  19. 11-Mar-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  20. 30-Jan-2024

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  21. 07-Nov-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  22. 29-Aug-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  23. 16-May-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  24. 14-Mar-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  25. 22-Feb-2023

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  26. 30-Nov-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  27. 11-Oct-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  28. 27-Aug-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  29. 10-Aug-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  30. 14-Jul-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  31. 25-Apr-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  32. 22-Apr-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  33. 21-Apr-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  34. 03-Feb-2022

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  35. 02-Nov-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  36. 05-Aug-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  37. 13-Jul-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  38. 20-Mar-2021

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  39. 21-Dec-2020

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  40. 06-Oct-2020

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  41. 27-Jul-2020

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  42. 08-May-2020

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  43. 01-Apr-2020

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  44. 20-Jan-2020

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  45. 14-Nov-2019

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  46. 13-Sep-2019

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  47. 13-Aug-2019

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  48. 09-May-2019

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  49. 08-May-2019

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  50. 06-May-2019

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  51. 06-Mar-2019

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  52. 19-Dec-2018

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  53. 25-Sep-2018

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  54. 25-May-2018

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  55. 14-Feb-2018

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  56. 01-Nov-2017

    Awaiting records

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  57. 15-Jul-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  58. 20-Apr-2017

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  59. 16-Jan-2017

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  60. 13-Oct-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  61. 25-Jul-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 02

  62. 08-Jul-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 24-Jun-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 05/2022 (CIS No. 29/2016) Petitioner: Rajendra (son of Badri Prasad) Respondent: Gram Panchayat Malakhera The appellate court dismissed Rajendra's appeal against the trial court's dismissal of his suit. Rajendra had sought a mandatory injunction requiring the Gram Panchayat to construct a shop on a disputed plot (4×5 feet) and hand it over to him as a tenant after receiving ₹10,000 as advance rent. The court found that Rajendra failed to prove his entitlement because: (1) the disputed site had electricity infrastructure and an access road obstruction making it unsuitable for construction; (2) both parties acknowledged these impediments; and (3) Rajendra provided no evidence of attempting alternative remedies or seeking refund of the deposited amount, undermining his claim of genuine prejudice from the Panchayat's alleged breach of promise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case