ANUSKA vs State Advocate - APO — 222/2026

Case Summary: 222/2026 - Anuska v. State Advocate and Pawan Kumar Court Decision: The Session Court of Alwar dismissed the petitioner Anuska's application seeking to cancel the bail granted to accused Pawan Kumar under Section 483(3) of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the primary basis for granting bail—evidence from the accused's mobile call location details (CDR) showing the petitioner and accused were at different locations during the alleged incident—remained valid and demonstrated prima facie credibility. Though the accused had previously filed unsuccessful bail applications and a bail petition was rejected by the Rajasthan High Court on August 26, 2025 (a fact not disclosed to the lower court), the court reasoned that the subsequent discovery of prima facie evidence supporting the accused's case justified the bail grant and did not warrant its cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.