ANUSKA vs State Advocate - APO — 222/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAL010006792026

Filing Number

493/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

287

Police Station

KOTWALI ALWAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANUSKA

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - APO

  2. 2.PAWAN KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 222/2026 - Anuska v. State Advocate and Pawan Kumar Court Decision: The Session Court of Alwar dismissed the petitioner Anuska's application seeking to cancel the bail granted to accused Pawan Kumar under Section 483(3) of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the primary basis for granting bail—evidence from the accused's mobile call location details (CDR) showing the petitioner and accused were at different locations during the alleged incident—remained valid and demonstrated prima facie credibility. Though the accused had previously filed unsuccessful bail applications and a bail petition was rejected by the Rajasthan High Court on August 26, 2025 (a fact not disclosed to the lower court), the court reasoned that the subsequent discovery of prima facie evidence supporting the accused's case justified the bail grant and did not warrant its cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District And Sessions Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    District And Sessions Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 222/2026 - Anuska v. State Advocate and Pawan Kumar Court Decision: The Session Court of Alwar dismissed the petitioner Anuska's application seeking to cancel the bail granted to accused Pawan Kumar under Section 483(3) of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the primary basis for granting bail—evidence from the accused's mobile call location details (CDR) showing the petitioner and accused were at different locations during the alleged incident—remained valid and demonstrated prima facie credibility. Though the accused had previously filed unsuccessful bail applications and a bail petition was rejected by the Rajasthan High Court on August 26, 2025 (a fact not disclosed to the lower court), the court reasoned that the subsequent discovery of prima facie evidence supporting the accused's case justified the bail grant and did not warrant its cancellation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case