Ms RAJASTHAN GLASS HOUSE ALWAR vs KAILASH MEENA Advocate - APO — 59/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC

CNR: RJAL010006642026

Filing Number

481/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

59/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ms RAJASTHAN GLASS HOUSE ALWAR

    Adv. BHAGWAN SAHAY SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAILASH MEENA Advocate - APO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by Rajasthan Glass House challenging an order passed by the presiding officer. The court found no basis to conclude that the presiding officer acted with bias or mala fides against the petitioner, and held that even if the officer's order violated the petitioner's rights, the appropriate remedy lay in pursuing statutory legal remedies rather than this petition. Accordingly, the petition was rejected on merits without any consequential orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Orders

    District And Sessions Judge

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Orders

    District And Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Orders

    District And Sessions Judge

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District And Sessions Judge

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    District And Sessions Judge

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by Rajasthan Glass House challenging an order passed by the presiding officer. The court found no basis to conclude that the presiding officer acted with bias or mala fides against the petitioner, and held that even if the officer's order violated the petitioner's rights, the appropriate remedy lay in pursuing statutory legal remedies rather than this petition. Accordingly, the petition was rejected on merits without any consequential orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case