SADDAM KHAN vs State Advocate - APO — 196/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 30th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAL010006102026
Filing Number
443/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
196/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ
Judge
1-District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
ARAVALI VIHAR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SADDAM KHAN
Adv. HEM RAJ GUPTA
Respondent(s)
State Advocate - APO
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 19-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 196/2026 - Saddam Khan v. State Advocate Court Decision: The Session Court in Alwar rejected Saddam Khan's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 CrPC on March 30, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that Khan was involved in an organized cyber-fraud conspiracy with co-accused Arbaaz Khan, who operated fraudulent bank accounts to deceive people through social media apps into purchasing non-existent goods. Evidence showed Khan provided the bank account to Arbaaz and received 10% commission from fraud proceeds. With 8 documented cyber-fraud complaints and Khan's prior criminal history (7 previous criminal cases), the court determined bail was unjustified and that investigation remained ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 196/2026 - Saddam Khan v. State Advocate Court Decision: The Session Court in Alwar rejected Saddam Khan's anticipatory bail petition under Section 482 CrPC on March 30, 2026. Key Reasoning: The court found that Khan was involved in an organized cyber-fraud conspiracy with co-accused Arbaaz Khan, who operated fraudulent bank accounts to deceive people through social media apps into purchasing non-existent goods. Evidence showed Khan provided the bank account to Arbaaz and received 10% commission from fraud proceeds. With 8 documented cyber-fraud complaints and Khan's prior criminal history (7 previous criminal cases), the court determined bail was unjustified and that investigation remained ongoing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts