GAJENDRA SINGH NARUKA vs State Advocate - APO — 20/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 24th March 2026.

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJAL010003452026

Case disposed

Filing Number

245/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

03-02-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440

Petitioner(s)

GAJENDRA SINGH NARUKA

Adv. HIMANSHU BAGRAHATTA

Respondent(s)

State Advocate - APO

SANJAY SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge

24-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

20-02-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

10-02-2026

Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order

The Session Court of Alwar allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Gajendra Singh Naruka against the lower court's order dated 04.06.2025, which had terminated his cross-examination opportunity. The court found that the petitioner's counsel had presented a valid adjournment request citing engagement in another court, and the lower court's refusal to grant another opportunity for cross-examination was unjustified; accordingly, the court set aside the lower court's order and directed it to provide the petitioner one more opportunity for cross-examination, with the understanding that any subsequent non-appearance would result in automatic closure of cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Session Court of Alwar allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Gajendra Singh Naruka against the lower court's order dated 04.06.2025, which had terminated his cross-examination opportunity. The court found that the petitioner's counsel had presented a valid adjournment request citing engagement in another court, and the lower court's refusal to grant another opportunity for cross-examination was unjustified; accordingly, the court set aside the lower court's order and directed it to provide the petitioner one more opportunity for cross-examination, with the understanding that any subsequent non-appearance would result in automatic closure of cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case