GAJENDRA SINGH NARUKA vs State Advocate - APO — 20/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Revision

CNR: RJAL010003452026

Filing Number

245/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAJENDRA SINGH NARUKA

    Adv. HIMANSHU BAGRAHATTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Advocate - APO

  2. 2.SANJAY SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Session Court of Alwar allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Gajendra Singh Naruka against the lower court's order dated 04.06.2025, which had terminated his cross-examination opportunity. The court found that the petitioner's counsel had presented a valid adjournment request citing engagement in another court, and the lower court's refusal to grant another opportunity for cross-examination was unjustified; accordingly, the court set aside the lower court's order and directed it to provide the petitioner one more opportunity for cross-examination, with the understanding that any subsequent non-appearance would result in automatic closure of cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District And Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District And Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    District And Sessions Judge

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Session Court of Alwar allowed the criminal revision petition filed by Gajendra Singh Naruka against the lower court's order dated 04.06.2025, which had terminated his cross-examination opportunity. The court found that the petitioner's counsel had presented a valid adjournment request citing engagement in another court, and the lower court's refusal to grant another opportunity for cross-examination was unjustified; accordingly, the court set aside the lower court's order and directed it to provide the petitioner one more opportunity for cross-examination, with the understanding that any subsequent non-appearance would result in automatic closure of cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case