Smt. JAITUNI vs ALIMAL Advocate - SAHALINDRA BHARGAVA — 12/2016

Case under 163-A Section CIVILMISC.APPEAL. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.m.appl. - Civil Misc.Appeal

CNR: RJAL010001172016

Filing Number

71/2016

Filing Date

16-Jan-2016

Registration No

12/2016

Registration Date

18-Jan-2016

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

163-A Section CIVILMISC.APPEAL

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. JAITUNI

    Adv. DINESH KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ALIMAL Advocate - SAHALINDRA BHARGAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary Case 12/2016 - Smt. Jaituni v. Alimani The Rajasthan High Court upheld a lower court's order regarding disputed agricultural land (Plot Nos. 110 and 111, totaling 2 acres 1 hectare 49 acres in Gram Itrana). The appellants argued they held inheritance rights under Muslim law (2/3 share for daughters and 1/3 for sons), while respondents claimed superior ownership based on original cultivation rights. The court found the appellants had not established prima facie ownership and maintained the status quo, directing them not to alienate the property or create encumbrances. The appeal was dismissed with the lower court's decision dated 15.12.2015 upheld without legal defect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  8. 23-Sep-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  9. 14-Jul-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  10. 19-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  11. 17-Mar-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  12. 13-Jan-2025

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  13. 28-Oct-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  14. 05-Aug-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  15. 08-Apr-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  16. 29-Jan-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  17. 16-Nov-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  18. 11-Sep-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  19. 20-Jul-2023

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  20. 06-Apr-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  21. 03-Mar-2023

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  22. 08-Dec-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  23. 15-Sep-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  24. 14-Jul-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  25. 20-Apr-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 04

  26. 21-Jan-2022

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  27. 22-Oct-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  28. 26-Jul-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  29. 03-Apr-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  30. 19-Jan-2021

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  31. 22-Oct-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  32. 17-Jul-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  33. 30-Apr-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  34. 26-Mar-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  35. 23-Jan-2020

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  36. 18-Nov-2019

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  37. 23-Sep-2019

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  38. 29-Jul-2019

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  39. 29-Apr-2019

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  40. 12-Feb-2019

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  41. 11-Dec-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  42. 28-Sep-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  43. 02-Aug-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  44. 20-Apr-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  45. 05-Mar-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  46. 09-Jan-2018

    Final arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  47. 25-Sep-2017

    Arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  48. 26-Aug-2017

    Arguments

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  49. 05-Aug-2017

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  50. 18-Jul-2017

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 03

  51. 09-May-2017

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  52. 24-Jan-2017

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  53. 24-Oct-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  54. 21-Sep-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  55. 05-Aug-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  56. 04-Jul-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  57. 28-Apr-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  58. 03-Mar-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  59. 03-Feb-2016

    Appearence

    Additional District and Sessions Judge No 01

  60. 20-Jan-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 16-Jan-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case 12/2016 - Smt. Jaituni v. Alimani The Rajasthan High Court upheld a lower court's order regarding disputed agricultural land (Plot Nos. 110 and 111, totaling 2 acres 1 hectare 49 acres in Gram Itrana). The appellants argued they held inheritance rights under Muslim law (2/3 share for daughters and 1/3 for sons), while respondents claimed superior ownership based on original cultivation rights. The court found the appellants had not established prima facie ownership and maintained the status quo, directing them not to alienate the property or create encumbrances. The appeal was dismissed with the lower court's decision dated 15.12.2015 upheld without legal defect. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case