BIJENDRA KUMAR vs MANDIR MURTI SHRI JAGAN NATH JI — 9/2016

Case under 163-A Section CIVILMISCAPPEAL. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 23rd March 2026.

C.m.appl. - Civil Misc.Appeal

CNR: RJAL010000902016

Case disposed

Filing Number

47/2016

Filing Date

07-01-2016

Registration No

9/2016

Registration Date

08-01-2016

Court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ

Judge

1-District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Acts & Sections

163-A Section CIVILMISCAPPEAL

Petitioner(s)

BIJENDRA KUMAR

Adv. SH. D. SIDDHA

Respondent(s)

MANDIR MURTI SHRI JAGAN NATH JI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District And Sessions Judge

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

09-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

23-02-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

02-02-2026

Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Order

The court dismissed Bijendra Kumar's appeal against the lower court order dated 21.11.2015 regarding property rights related to Mandir Murti Shri Jagan Nath Ji. The court upheld the prior order maintaining the property's connection to the temple and distribution of inheritance shares (1/1 to 1/3) among the legal heirs, while directing the subordinate court to expedite the pending original case within three months. The appeal was disposed with directions to preserve relevant records and maintain the status quo on property matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Bijendra Kumar's appeal against the lower court order dated 21.11.2015 regarding property rights related to Mandir Murti Shri Jagan Nath Ji. The court upheld the prior order maintaining the property's connection to the temple and distribution of inheritance shares (1/1 to 1/3) among the legal heirs, while directing the subordinate court to expedite the pending original case within three months. The appeal was disposed with directions to preserve relevant records and maintain the status quo on property matters. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Alwar District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case