ROCKY NEHRA vs State — 67/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ290002312026
Filing Number
124/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
67/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
ADJ NASIRABAD TALUKA
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
467
Police Station
Nasirabad Sadar
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROCKY NEHRA
Adv. SHARWAN SINGH RAWAT
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 67/2026 - Rocky Nehra v. State Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nasirabad granted bail to petitioner Rocky Nehra (alias Rakesh) on March 13, 2026. The court accepted his bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita despite the Advocate General's opposition regarding the serious nature of the charges under Sections 3/25(1-B)(A) and 5/25(1)(A) of the Arms Act, 1959 (as amended 2019). Key Reasoning: The court found that no recovery was made from the petitioner himself, he was not named in the original FIR but implicated based on statements from the arrested person (Pavan Kumar Bhargav). The court noted the case would take considerable time for trial and considered the bail conditions sufficient. The court imposed bail of ₹25,000 each from two sureties (one being a close relative) plus ₹50,000 self-bond, with the condition that the petitioner appear regularly in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 67/2026 - Rocky Nehra v. State Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nasirabad granted bail to petitioner Rocky Nehra (alias Rakesh) on March 13, 2026. The court accepted his bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita despite the Advocate General's opposition regarding the serious nature of the charges under Sections 3/25(1-B)(A) and 5/25(1)(A) of the Arms Act, 1959 (as amended 2019). Key Reasoning: The court found that no recovery was made from the petitioner himself, he was not named in the original FIR but implicated based on statements from the arrested person (Pavan Kumar Bhargav). The court noted the case would take considerable time for trial and considered the bail conditions sufficient. The court imposed bail of ₹25,000 each from two sureties (one being a close relative) plus ₹50,000 self-bond, with the condition that the petitioner appear regularly in court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts