RAM KISHAN JIYANI AND OTHERS vs State — 66/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ290002302026

Filing Number

123/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

66/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

ADJ NASIRABAD TALUKA

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

78

Police Station

Nasirabad Sadar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAM KISHAN JIYANI AND OTHERS

    Adv. RAJESH CHAND LAKHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

  2. 2.TOLA RAM

  3. 3.TARA CHAND GITHALA

  4. 4.VISHNU PAREEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 66/2026 Court Decision: The court GRANTED bail to all four petitioners (Ram Kishan Jiyani, Tola Ram, Tara Chand Githala, and Vishnu Parik) in an NDPS Act case involving alleged possession of 70.29 kg of poppy husk. Each petitioner must furnish two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000, with the condition of regular court attendance. Key Reasoning: The court found procedural violations in the investigation, specifically that the accused were searched without a magistrate's supervision as required under Section 50 of the NDPS Act. Considering the investigation time required, the accused's permanent residence, family ties, clean criminal records, and lack of flight risk, bail was justified despite the serious nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 66/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 66/2026 Court Decision: The court GRANTED bail to all four petitioners (Ram Kishan Jiyani, Tola Ram, Tara Chand Githala, and Vishnu Parik) in an NDPS Act case involving alleged possession of 70.29 kg of poppy husk. Each petitioner must furnish two sureties of ₹25,000 each and a personal bond of ₹50,000, with the condition of regular court attendance. Key Reasoning: The court found procedural violations in the investigation, specifically that the accused were searched without a magistrate's supervision as required under Section 50 of the NDPS Act. Considering the investigation time required, the accused's permanent residence, family ties, clean criminal records, and lack of flight risk, bail was justified despite the serious nature of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case