SHABBIR KHAN vs State — 64/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ290002282026
Filing Number
121/2026
Filing Date
11-03-2026
Registration No
64/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
ADJ NASIRABAD TALUKA
Judge
1-ADJ
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
FIR Details
FIR Number
242
Police Station
Nasirabad Sadar
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHABBIR KHAN
Adv. Firoj Khan
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADJ
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shabbir Khan v. State (Case 64/2026) Shabbir Khan, age 23, was arrested on June 14, 2024, under Sections 8/15 of the NDPS Act after 179.09 kg of poppy husk was allegedly recovered from a vehicle in his exclusive possession. Charged on April 17, 2025, and detained for approximately 20 months, Khan petitioned for bail arguing he is a young laborer with permanent residence, posing no flight risk, and that trial would consume considerable time. The court granted bail, finding that despite the seriousness of the offense and witness testimony being recorded, the prolonged judicial custody and trial timeline justified release. Khan was granted bail on furnishing two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each (one being a close relative) and his own bond of Rs. 50,000, with a condition to appear regularly before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Shabbir Khan v. State (Case 64/2026) Shabbir Khan, age 23, was arrested on June 14, 2024, under Sections 8/15 of the NDPS Act after 179.09 kg of poppy husk was allegedly recovered from a vehicle in his exclusive possession. Charged on April 17, 2025, and detained for approximately 20 months, Khan petitioned for bail arguing he is a young laborer with permanent residence, posing no flight risk, and that trial would consume considerable time. The court granted bail, finding that despite the seriousness of the offense and witness testimony being recorded, the prolonged judicial custody and trial timeline justified release. Khan was granted bail on furnishing two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each (one being a close relative) and his own bond of Rs. 50,000, with a condition to appear regularly before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts