STATE vs SURESH YOGI ETC8 Advocate - VAIBHAV JAIN — 3/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,323,341. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJAJ290002032018

Filing Number

42/2018

Filing Date

02-Jan-2017

Registration No

3/2017

Registration Date

02-Jan-2017

Court

ADJ NASIRABAD TALUKA

Judge

1-ADJ

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

177

Police Station

Mangliyawas

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 395,323,341

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

    Adv. ADD PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESH YOGI ETC8 Advocate - VAIBHAV JAIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Court Judgment Summary Court: Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nasirabad, Ajmer Case: Session Case No. 42/2018 (FIR 03/2017) - State vs. Suresh Yogi and 8 others Decision Date: 18-03-2026 Key Ruling: The court acquitted all seven accused under IPC Sections 395 (dacoity), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 341 (wrongful restraint) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant died before trial and key eyewitnesses turned hostile, refusing to support the alleged robbery incident on 25-08-2016 at Rajgarh intersection. Two accused were discharged as proceedings against them were abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  12. 06-Feb-2026

    Final arguments

    ADJ

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    ADJ

  14. 03-Feb-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    ADJ

  15. 14-Jan-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    ADJ

  16. 17-Dec-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  17. 07-Nov-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  18. 09-Oct-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  19. 19-Aug-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  20. 15-Jul-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  21. 10-Jun-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  22. 06-May-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  23. 17-Apr-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  24. 27-Mar-2025

    Compliance

    ADJ

  25. 07-Mar-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    ADJ

  26. 21-Feb-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    ADJ

  27. 14-Feb-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    ADJ

  28. 31-Jan-2025

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    ADJ

  29. 17-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  30. 06-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  31. 08-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  32. 04-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  33. 06-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  34. 02-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  35. 28-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  36. 01-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  37. 03-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  38. 12-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    ADJ

  39. 05-Apr-2024

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  40. 17-Feb-2024

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  41. 05-Jan-2024

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  42. 03-Nov-2023

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  43. 30-Sep-2023

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  44. 25-Aug-2023

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  45. 06-Jun-2023

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  46. 29-Mar-2023

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  47. 11-Jan-2023

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  48. 14-Oct-2022

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  49. 04-Aug-2022

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  50. 25-May-2022

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  51. 02-Mar-2022

    Appearance of accused

    ADJ

  52. 07-Dec-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  53. 02-Jan-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary Court: Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nasirabad, Ajmer Case: Session Case No. 42/2018 (FIR 03/2017) - State vs. Suresh Yogi and 8 others Decision Date: 18-03-2026 Key Ruling: The court acquitted all seven accused under IPC Sections 395 (dacoity), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), and 341 (wrongful restraint) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant died before trial and key eyewitnesses turned hostile, refusing to support the alleged robbery incident on 25-08-2016 at Rajgarh intersection. Two accused were discharged as proceedings against them were abated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case