RAM KANWARI vs NAGAR PALIKA PUSHKAR — 32/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1-2. Disposed: Uncontested--Transferred on 19th March 2026.
Civil Misc. Connected (41) - CIVIL MISC (C)
CNR: RJAJ230000802024
Filing Number
80/2024
Filing Date
15-07-2024
Registration No
32/2024
Registration Date
15-07-2024
Court
JM PUSHKAR TALUKA CIVIL
Judge
1-Civil Judge Sr Div
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Transferred
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAM KANWARI
Adv. SHRI MANISH JANGID
Respondent(s)
NAGAR PALIKA PUSHKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Sr Div
Disposed
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 07-03-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 24-02-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
| 17-02-2026 | Awaiting Services of notices/ summons |
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Judge of Pushkar, Ajmer granted an interim temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner in a property dispute (Civil Suit No. 34/2024). The court found that the petitioner is the rightful owner with registered documents, ownership certificate from the municipality, and approved construction plan from 1991, and has not conducted any construction after purchase in 2007. The respondent's objections regarding lack of post-2007 approval and procedural violations cannot be resolved at the interim stage. Consequently, the respondent is restrained from interfering with the petitioner's possession and use of the property until the next hearing date set for 17.08.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Judge of Pushkar, Ajmer granted an interim temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner in a property dispute (Civil Suit No. 34/2024). The court found that the petitioner is the rightful owner with registered documents, ownership certificate from the municipality, and approved construction plan from 1991, and has not conducted any construction after purchase in 2007. The respondent's objections regarding lack of post-2007 approval and procedural violations cannot be resolved at the interim stage. Consequently, the respondent is restrained from interfering with the petitioner's possession and use of the property until the next hearing date set for 17.08.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts