VISHNU CHAND vs AJMER JILA GURJAR — 25/2014

Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

EXECUITION CASES

CNR: RJAJ230000582014

Compliance

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

761/2014

Filing Date

21-04-2014

Registration No

25/2014

Registration Date

21-04-2014

Court

JM PUSHKAR TALUKA CIVIL

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Div

Petitioner(s)

VISHNU CHAND

Adv. SHRI PUSHKARNARAYAN PARASHAR

Respondent(s)

AJMER JILA GURJAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Div

25-05-2026

Compliance

18-05-2026

Compliance

11-05-2026

Compliance

04-05-2026

Compliance

27-04-2026

Compliance

Interim Orders

10-02-2025
misc.order
25-02-2025
misc.order
16-01-2026
misc.order
16-01-2026
misc.order

Case Summary: Vishnu Chand v. Ajmer Jila Gurjar (25/2014) Outcome: Multiple petitions dismissed; possession warrant issued for disputed property at Gurjar Ghat, Pushkar. The court rejected petitioner Vishnu Chand's various applications challenging a decree regarding property at Gurjar Ghat. The respondent (Ajmer District Gurjar Society) had obtained a possession order. Key holdings: (1) petitions challenging death of a deceased defendant were dismissed as the cause of action had ceased; (2) applications for affidavit and counter-affidavit were rejected; and (3) the court upheld the decree, issuing a writ of possession directing delivery of the disputed property to the decree-holder by January 10, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vishnu Chand v. Ajmer Jila Gurjar (25/2014) Outcome: Multiple petitions dismissed; possession warrant issued for disputed property at Gurjar Ghat, Pushkar. The court rejected petitioner Vishnu Chand's various applications challenging a decree regarding property at Gurjar Ghat. The respondent (Ajmer District Gurjar Society) had obtained a possession order. Key holdings: (1) petitions challenging death of a deceased defendant were dismissed as the cause of action had ceased; (2) applications for affidavit and counter-affidavit were rejected; and (3) the court upheld the decree, issuing a writ of possession directing delivery of the disputed property to the decree-holder by January 10, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

JM PUSHKAR TALUKA CIVIL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case