STATE vs NISAR ETC. Advocate - SHRI ARJUN SINGH — 6338/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406,494,109. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 02nd April 2026.

REG. CRI. CASE

CNR: RJAJ220001852015

Case disposed

Filing Number

375/2015

Filing Date

03-04-2015

Registration No

6338/2015

Registration Date

08-12-2014

Court

JM PUSHKAR TALUKA CRIMINAL

Judge

2-ACJM

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

Pisangan

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498A,406,494,109

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NISAR ETC. Advocate - SHRI ARJUN SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM

02-04-2026

Disposed

01-04-2026

Judgment

30-03-2026

Final arguments

28-03-2026

Final arguments

27-03-2026

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
judgement

Summary of Case 6338/2015 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Pushkar acquitted accused Nisar Ahmad on charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) on April 2, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed conjugal cruelty or misappropriated the woman's dowry after marriage, as the key witness (the complaining woman) provided inconsistent testimony during cross-examination and did not establish specific dates or corroborating details of the alleged abuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 6338/2015 The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Pushkar acquitted accused Nisar Ahmad on charges under IPC Sections 498-A (cruelty to wife) and 406 (criminal breach of trust) on April 2, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused committed conjugal cruelty or misappropriated the woman's dowry after marriage, as the key witness (the complaining woman) provided inconsistent testimony during cross-examination and did not establish specific dates or corroborating details of the alleged abuse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JM PUSHKAR TALUKA CRIMINAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case