State vs MAHAVEER URF RAJU Advocate - SHRI ARJUN SINGH) Tolaram — 5684/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 05th May 2026.
REG. CRI. CASE
CNR: RJAJ220000652012
Filing Number
383/2014
Filing Date
30-06-2012
Registration No
5684/2014
Registration Date
30-06-2012
Court
JM PUSHKAR TALUKA CRIMINAL
Judge
2-ACJM
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
Pushkar
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecutor) APP II Advocate-advocate
Respondent(s)
MAHAVEER URF RAJU Advocate - SHRI ARJUN SINGH) Tolaram
Adv. advocate
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 30-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 28-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 5684/2014 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pushkar acquitted both accused—Mahaveer alias Raju (age 35) and Tollaram (age 45)—of charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 (burglary and theft) on May 5, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accused committed the alleged theft of items from the complainant's home without reasonable doubt, as key prosecution witnesses contradicted each other regarding whether stolen goods were actually recovered from the accused's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 5684/2014 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pushkar acquitted both accused—Mahaveer alias Raju (age 35) and Tollaram (age 45)—of charges under IPC Sections 457 and 380 (burglary and theft) on May 5, 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accused committed the alleged theft of items from the complainant's home without reasonable doubt, as key prosecution witnesses contradicted each other regarding whether stolen goods were actually recovered from the accused's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts