STATE GOVT.) APP II vs MEERA AND OTHERS Advocate - SHRI KULDEEP PARASHAR — 5630/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,120B. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 14th May 2026.
REG. CRI. CASE
CNR: RJAJ220000532011
Filing Number
318/2014
Filing Date
23-08-2011
Registration No
5630/2014
Registration Date
23-08-2011
Court
JM PUSHKAR TALUKA CRIMINAL
Judge
2-ACJM
Decision Date
14th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
34
Police Station
Pushkar
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE GOVT.) APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) II
Adv. advocate
Respondent(s)
MEERA AND OTHERS Advocate - SHRI KULDEEP PARASHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 07-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 01-05-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 28-04-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Meera and Others (Case 5630/2014) Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pushkar, Rajasthan Decision Date: 14.05.2026 Judgment: The court acquitted both accused persons (Meera and Geena) under IPC Sections 420 and 120-B for lack of sufficient evidence to prove criminal conspiracy and cheating. Key Facts: The case involved allegations that the accused fraudulently sold agricultural land (Plot No. 2093) twice—first to one party (Harbus Singh) in 2009 and then again to another party (Manoj Yadav) in 2010—after already receiving full consideration. The complainant alleged criminal breach of trust and conspiracy. Court's Reasoning: Despite detailed investigation and 16 prosecution witnesses, the court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of cheating (Section 420) or criminal conspiracy (Section 120-B). The documentary evidence, including sale deeds, showed proper registration and transfer of ownership, and contradictions in witness testimonies weakened the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Meera and Others (Case 5630/2014) Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pushkar, Rajasthan Decision Date: 14.05.2026 Judgment: The court acquitted both accused persons (Meera and Geena) under IPC Sections 420 and 120-B for lack of sufficient evidence to prove criminal conspiracy and cheating. Key Facts: The case involved allegations that the accused fraudulently sold agricultural land (Plot No. 2093) twice—first to one party (Harbus Singh) in 2009 and then again to another party (Manoj Yadav) in 2010—after already receiving full consideration. The complainant alleged criminal breach of trust and conspiracy. Court's Reasoning: Despite detailed investigation and 16 prosecution witnesses, the court found that the prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of cheating (Section 420) or criminal conspiracy (Section 120-B). The documentary evidence, including sale deeds, showed proper registration and transfer of ownership, and contradictions in witness testimonies weakened the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts