STATE GOVT. vs KAILASH Advocate - SHRI ARJUN SINGH — 5545/2014
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380. Disposed: Contested--Convicted and Sentenced on 11th May 2026.
REG. CRI. CASE
CNR: RJAJ220000342012
Filing Number
222/2014
Filing Date
05-Sep-2012
Registration No
5545/2014
Registration Date
05-Sep-2012
Court
JM PUSHKAR TALUKA CRIMINAL
Judge
2-Acjm
Decision Date
11-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Convicted and Sentenced
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
132
Police Station
Pushkar
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE GOVT.
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
-
1.KAILASH Advocate - SHRI ARJUN SINGH
-
2.GOPAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-May-2026
JudgementView PDF
CASE SUMMARY Case Number: 5545/2014 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pushkar, Ajmer, Rajasthan Decision Date: 11.05.2026 VERDICT The court convicted two accused persons (Kailash son of Shetan, age 33, and Gopal son of Ramsing, age 28) under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code for theft of computer equipment from a government school. KEY FACTS The case involved the theft of five computer sets, monitors, mice, keyboards, scanners, and printers worth significant value from a government middle school in Ajmer. The complainant, a school staff member, reported on July 13, 2012, that after the school's vacation on July 12, 2012, valuable computer equipment had been stolen from the computer lab. COURT'S REASONING The court found the prosecution's evidence—including witness statements from teachers and investigating officers, site inspections, seizure records, and confessional statements of the accused—credible and sufficient. The accused had specifically stolen the equipment through premeditation. The third accused (Vikram Singh) died during proceedings, resulting in closure of charges against him. --- Status: Final Conviction Sentence: Rigorous imprisonment and fine This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
11-May-2026
Restored
Acjm
-
11-May-2026
Disposed
Acjm
-
08-May-2026
Service of Non-bailable warrant
Acjm
-
07-May-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
05-May-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
02-May-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
15-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
30-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
25-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
13-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
06-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
27-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Acjm
-
20-Feb-2026
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Acjm
-
13-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
06-Feb-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
29-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
20-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Acjm
-
15-Nov-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
03-Oct-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
11-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
24-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
01-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
12-Jun-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
15-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
02-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
02-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
12-Mar-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
20-Feb-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
31-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
10-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
20-Dec-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
27-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
08-Nov-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
10-Oct-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
20-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
21-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
08-Aug-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
11-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
07-Jun-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
09-May-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
22-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
01-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
17-Jan-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
14-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
27-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
28-Aug-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
20-Jul-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
09-Jun-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
11-May-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
17-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
01-Feb-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
17-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
20-Oct-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
08-Sep-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
06-Aug-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
16-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
10-May-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
28-Mar-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
24-Feb-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
29-Jan-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
17-Dec-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
01-Nov-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
08-Sep-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
07-Jul-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
12-May-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
31-Mar-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm
-
05-Jan-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
09-Nov-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
28-Sep-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
24-Aug-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
17-Jul-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
12-Jun-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
08-May-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
04-Apr-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
23-Jan-2020
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
11-Dec-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
26-Sep-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
11-Jul-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
03-May-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
15-Mar-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
05-Jan-2019
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
03-Nov-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
03-Oct-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
03-Aug-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
22-May-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Jm Pushkar
-
22-Feb-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
24-Jan-2018
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
22-Sep-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
04-Aug-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
08-May-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
05-May-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
25-Jan-2017
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
28-Nov-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Sep-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
11-Jul-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
01-Jun-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Mar-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
02-Mar-2016
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
18-Dec-2015
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
17-Sep-2015
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
04-Jun-2015
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
19-Mar-2015
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
03-Dec-2014
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
27-Aug-2014
Prosecution Evidence
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
29-May-2014
Awaiting Warrant
Civil Judge Jr Div
-
27-Mar-2014
Awaiting Warrant
-
07-Dec-2013
Prosecution Evidence
-
16-Sep-2013
Prosecution Evidence
-
12-Jun-2013
Prosecution Evidence
-
05-Apr-2013
Prosecution Evidence
-
01-Mar-2013
Charge
-
15-Feb-2013
Charge
-
14-Dec-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Sep-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 5545/2014
CASE SUMMARY Case Number: 5545/2014 Court: Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pushkar, Ajmer, Rajasthan Decision Date: 11.05.2026 VERDICT The court convicted two accused persons (Kailash son of Shetan, age 33, and Gopal son of Ramsing, age 28) under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code for theft of computer equipment from a government school. KEY FACTS The case involved the theft of five computer sets, monitors, mice, keyboards, scanners, and printers worth significant value from a government middle school in Ajmer. The complainant, a school staff member, reported on July 13, 2012, that after the school's vacation on July 12, 2012, valuable computer equipment had been stolen from the computer lab. COURT'S REASONING The court found the prosecution's evidence—including witness statements from teachers and investigating officers, site inspections, seizure records, and confessional statements of the accused—credible and sufficient. The accused had specifically stolen the equipment through premeditation. The third accused (Vikram Singh) died during proceedings, resulting in closure of charges against him. --- Status: Final Conviction Sentence: Rigorous imprisonment and fine This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts