STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs JEETRAM SAINI Advocate - DOULAT SINGH RATHORE — 441/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAJ200009332023
Filing Number
932/2023
Filing Date
18-11-2023
Registration No
441/2023
Registration Date
18-11-2023
Court
JM SARWAR TALUKA CRIMINAL
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
281
Police Station
Sarwar
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
JEETRAM SAINI Advocate - DOULAT SINGH RATHORE
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 23-02-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 20-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 02-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Jeetram Saini The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Jeetram of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury) in a vehicle hit-and-run case from September 24, 2023. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Jeetram was the vehicle's driver—the complainant turned hostile, the vehicle owner denied knowing who drove it, and no witness definitively established Jeetram's presence at the accident scene. Additionally, no evidence demonstrated rash or negligent conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Jeetram Saini The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Jeetram of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury) in a vehicle hit-and-run case from September 24, 2023. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Jeetram was the vehicle's driver—the complainant turned hostile, the vehicle owner denied knowing who drove it, and no witness definitively established Jeetram's presence at the accident scene. Additionally, no evidence demonstrated rash or negligent conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts