STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs JEETRAM SAINI Advocate - DOULAT SINGH RATHORE — 441/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 17th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAJ200009332023

Case disposed

Filing Number

932/2023

Filing Date

18-11-2023

Registration No

441/2023

Registration Date

18-11-2023

Court

JM SARWAR TALUKA CRIMINAL

Judge

1-JM

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

281

Police Station

Sarwar

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338

Petitioner(s)

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Adv. APO

Respondent(s)

JEETRAM SAINI Advocate - DOULAT SINGH RATHORE

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JM

17-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

23-02-2026

Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

20-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

02-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Jeetram Saini The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Jeetram of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury) in a vehicle hit-and-run case from September 24, 2023. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Jeetram was the vehicle's driver—the complainant turned hostile, the vehicle owner denied knowing who drove it, and no witness definitively established Jeetram's presence at the accident scene. Additionally, no evidence demonstrated rash or negligent conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Jeetram Saini The Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Jeetram of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, and 338 (rash/negligent driving causing injury) in a vehicle hit-and-run case from September 24, 2023. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Jeetram was the vehicle's driver—the complainant turned hostile, the vehicle owner denied knowing who drove it, and no witness definitively established Jeetram's presence at the accident scene. Additionally, no evidence demonstrated rash or negligent conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JM SARWAR TALUKA CRIMINAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case