STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs KAILASH Advocate - PRADHAN LAL JAT — 81/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 01st April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAJ200001042019
Filing Number
104/2019
Filing Date
06-03-2019
Registration No
81/2019
Registration Date
06-03-2019
Court
JM SARWAR TALUKA CRIMINAL
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
345
Police Station
Sarwar
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
KAILASH Advocate - PRADHAN LAL JAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 23-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 19-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 13-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Kailash (81/2019) Court Decision: The accused Kailash was acquitted of both charges under Section 379 IPC (theft) and Section 4/21 MMDR Act (illegal mineral transportation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While the court acknowledged that Section 22 of the MMDR Act requires authorized complaints for offenses under that statute, it ruled prosecution could proceed under IPC Section 379 for theft. However, critical investigative failures undermined the case: only police personnel served as witnesses (no independent witnesses), no FSL testing confirmed the material was gravel, no weight measurements were recorded, and the investigating officer died during proceedings. Combined with one hostile witness who denied the accused was driving, these deficiencies prevented establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Rajasthan v. Kailash (81/2019) Court Decision: The accused Kailash was acquitted of both charges under Section 379 IPC (theft) and Section 4/21 MMDR Act (illegal mineral transportation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While the court acknowledged that Section 22 of the MMDR Act requires authorized complaints for offenses under that statute, it ruled prosecution could proceed under IPC Section 379 for theft. However, critical investigative failures undermined the case: only police personnel served as witnesses (no independent witnesses), no FSL testing confirmed the material was gravel, no weight measurements were recorded, and the investigating officer died during proceedings. Combined with one hostile witness who denied the accused was driving, these deficiencies prevented establishing guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts