STATE OF RAJASTHAN vs MAHAVEER Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR PAREEK — 41/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th April 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAJ200001032025
Filing Number
103/2025
Filing Date
12-02-2025
Registration No
41/2025
Registration Date
12-02-2025
Court
JM SARWAR TALUKA CRIMINAL
Judge
1-JM
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
86
Police Station
Sarana
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Adv. APO
Respondent(s)
MAHAVEER Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR PAREEK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Disposed
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 01-04-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 27-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 23-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
| 13-03-2026 | Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C. |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused, Mahaveer (age 28) from Kesarpura, Saranda, Ajmer District, on charges under Section 85 BNS and Section 4/6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of dowry-related cruelty against the deaf and mute bride. The court found all prosecution witnesses to be hostile, noted settlement between parties, and determined that the prosecution's oral and documentary evidence did not conclusively prove the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused, Mahaveer (age 28) from Kesarpura, Saranda, Ajmer District, on charges under Section 85 BNS and Section 4/6 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution failed to establish sufficient evidence of dowry-related cruelty against the deaf and mute bride. The court found all prosecution witnesses to be hostile, noted settlement between parties, and determined that the prosecution's oral and documentary evidence did not conclusively prove the alleged crimes beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts