DWARKA PRASAD BAHETI vs PRADHAN GURJAR — 76/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--Disposed otherwise on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAJ200000972019

Filing Number

97/2019

Filing Date

05-Mar-2019

Registration No

76/2019

Registration Date

05-Mar-2019

Court

JM SARWAR TALUKA CRIMINAL

Judge

1-Jm

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed otherwise

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DWARKA PRASAD BAHETI

    Adv. VISHNU KUMAR VYAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADHAN GURJAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by Dwarka Prasad Baheti. The respondent Pradhan Gurjar's preliminary objection was accepted, and the court found the petition incompetent. The judgment noted that no court has jurisdiction to entertain the petition as it lacks proper standing under Section 138 of the relevant procedural code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  6. 27-Apr-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  7. 20-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  9. 16-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  10. 16-Apr-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  11. 06-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

  12. 06-Apr-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  13. 23-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  14. 23-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  15. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  16. 13-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  17. 09-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  18. 09-Mar-2026

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  19. 13-Nov-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  20. 04-Sep-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  21. 20-Jun-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  22. 15-Apr-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  23. 07-Feb-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  24. 02-Jan-2025

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  25. 19-Oct-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  26. 29-Aug-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  27. 26-Jun-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  28. 08-May-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  29. 19-Mar-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  30. 09-Jan-2024

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  31. 31-Oct-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  32. 13-Sep-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  33. 31-Jul-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  34. 26-May-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  35. 12-Apr-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  36. 21-Feb-2023

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  37. 07-Dec-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  38. 02-Nov-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  39. 22-Sep-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  40. 04-Aug-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  41. 08-Jun-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  42. 16-May-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  43. 05-May-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  44. 16-Mar-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  45. 24-Jan-2022

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  46. 17-Nov-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  47. 30-Sep-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  48. 05-Jul-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  49. 07-May-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  50. 25-Mar-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Jm

  51. 29-Jan-2021

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  52. 19-Nov-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  53. 14-Sep-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  54. 16-Jun-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  55. 21-May-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  56. 28-Apr-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  57. 25-Feb-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  58. 17-Jan-2020

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  59. 21-Nov-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  60. 30-Sep-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  61. 30-Aug-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  62. 19-Aug-2019

    Appearance of accused

  63. 16-Jul-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  64. 11-Jun-2019

    Appearance of accused

    Civil Judge (J.d.) & Judicial Magistrate

  65. 22-Apr-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  66. 05-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by Dwarka Prasad Baheti. The respondent Pradhan Gurjar's preliminary objection was accepted, and the court found the petition incompetent. The judgment noted that no court has jurisdiction to entertain the petition as it lacks proper standing under Section 138 of the relevant procedural code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case