CHAMPA DEVI vs SHIVRAJ — 2/2026
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125(3). Status: Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service. Next hearing: 08th May 2026.
Cr. Misc. Cases - CR. MISC
CNR: RJAJ200000112026
Next Hearing
08th May 2026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
03-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
03-01-2026
Court
JM SARWAR TALUKA CRIMINAL
Judge
1-JM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAMPA DEVI
Adv. DOULAT SINGH RATHORE
Respondent(s)
SHIVRAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JM
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 24-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 12-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 11-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted the petitioner's (Smt. Champa Devi) petition under Section 125(3) of the CrPC. The court ordered the respondent (Shivraj) to pay ₹8,000 per month as maintenance through salary deduction into the petitioner's bank account, and directed recovery of ₹48,000 in outstanding maintenance dues through a collection warrant. The court found the respondent's intentional non-compliance with previous maintenance orders unjustifiable and directed the District Education Officer to enforce the deduction mechanism. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted the petitioner's (Smt. Champa Devi) petition under Section 125(3) of the CrPC. The court ordered the respondent (Shivraj) to pay ₹8,000 per month as maintenance through salary deduction into the petitioner's bank account, and directed recovery of ₹48,000 in outstanding maintenance dues through a collection warrant. The court found the respondent's intentional non-compliance with previous maintenance orders unjustifiable and directed the District Education Officer to enforce the deduction mechanism. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts