SUBHASH KHORWAL vs YASIN @ AASIN MOHAMMAD — 80/2020

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,,140. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 07th April 2026.

MACT Main - MACP

CNR: RJAJ170006832020

Case disposed

Filing Number

288/2020

Filing Date

25-11-2020

Registration No

80/2020

Registration Date

01-12-2020

Court

ADJ KISHANGARH TALUKA

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166,,140

Petitioner(s)

SUBHASH KHORWAL

Adv. SANJEEV GUNJAL

Respondent(s)

YASIN @ AASIN MOHAMMAD

BABU MOHAMMAD

National Insurance Company Limited

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

07-04-2026

Disposed

02-04-2026

Judgment

27-03-2026

Final arguments

19-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

13-03-2026

Plaintiff Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: Subhash Khorwal v. Yasin @ Aasin Mohammad & Others (80/2020) Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the petitioner's claim for compensation of ₹34,13,000. The court found that the accident was caused by vehicle RJ14-DD-4979, not the insured vehicle RJ47-SC-4889 as claimed. Since the petitioner failed to establish that the insured vehicle caused the accident through credible evidence and witness testimony, he has no right to claim compensation from the insurance company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Subhash Khorwal v. Yasin @ Aasin Mohammad & Others (80/2020) Court Decision: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rejected the petitioner's claim for compensation of ₹34,13,000. The court found that the accident was caused by vehicle RJ14-DD-4979, not the insured vehicle RJ47-SC-4889 as claimed. Since the petitioner failed to establish that the insured vehicle caused the accident through credible evidence and witness testimony, he has no right to claim compensation from the insurance company. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ KISHANGARH TALUKA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case