BHANWARLAL vs SHIVPAL AND OTHERS — 17/2018
Case under C.p.c Section O7R1. Status: Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJAJ170004782018
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
Filing Number
330/2018
Filing Date
31-05-2018
Registration No
17/2018
Registration Date
31-05-2018
Court
ADJ KISHANGARH TALUKA
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHANWARLAL
Adv. PARMANAND SHARMA
Respondent(s)
SHIVPAL AND OTHERS
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Suit No. 18/2021, Bhawarlal vs. Shivpal and Others Court: Additional District Judge No. 2, Kishangarh, Ajmer Date: 13.03.2026 Outcome: The court dismissed the applications filed by Piyush Luhadia and Siddharth Luhadia seeking to be impleaded as necessary parties (Defendants 6 and 7) in the suit. The court held that the applicants, who obtained lease deeds for the disputed property during the pendency of the case, do not qualify as necessary parties since their rights are subordinate to Defendant 2's property rights already before the court, and impleading them would cause unnecessary delays. The case is adjourned to 18.03.2026 for further arguments on other pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Suit No. 18/2021, Bhawarlal vs. Shivpal and Others Court: Additional District Judge No. 2, Kishangarh, Ajmer Date: 13.03.2026 Outcome: The court dismissed the applications filed by Piyush Luhadia and Siddharth Luhadia seeking to be impleaded as necessary parties (Defendants 6 and 7) in the suit. The court held that the applicants, who obtained lease deeds for the disputed property during the pendency of the case, do not qualify as necessary parties since their rights are subordinate to Defendant 2's property rights already before the court, and impleading them would cause unnecessary delays. The case is adjourned to 18.03.2026 for further arguments on other pending applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts