gulab devi vs p.w.d. — 5/2017
Case under C.p.c Section 41r1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 27th March 2026.
Civil Regular Appeal - CIVIL REG. APPEAL
CNR: RJAJ170003472017
Filing Number
812/2017
Filing Date
11-04-2017
Registration No
5/2017
Registration Date
11-04-2017
Court
ADJ KISHANGARH TALUKA
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
gulab devi
Adv. RAMDHAN POSHAK
Respondent(s)
p.w.d.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Disposed
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Final arguments |
| 19-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Gulab Devi v. P.W.D. (Civil Appeal 36/2021) Court Decision (27.03.2026): The appellate court dismissed the appeal and quashed the lower court's order dated 27.02.2017, holding that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. The court ruled that since the disputed land (Khasra 332) is agricultural revenue land, disputes regarding boundaries, land acquisition, and related remedies fall exclusively under revenue courts' jurisdiction, not civil courts'. The petitioner's claims for permanent and mandatory injunctions regarding alleged unauthorized road construction on their agricultural land were therefore impermissible in civil jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Gulab Devi v. P.W.D. (Civil Appeal 36/2021) Court Decision (27.03.2026): The appellate court dismissed the appeal and quashed the lower court's order dated 27.02.2017, holding that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case. The court ruled that since the disputed land (Khasra 332) is agricultural revenue land, disputes regarding boundaries, land acquisition, and related remedies fall exclusively under revenue courts' jurisdiction, not civil courts'. The petitioner's claims for permanent and mandatory injunctions regarding alleged unauthorized road construction on their agricultural land were therefore impermissible in civil jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts