state vs saeed khan Advocate - PRATEEK MEHTA — 2/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,149,341,323,324,447. Status: Final arguments. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAJ170002932024
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
187/2024
Filing Date
28-02-2024
Registration No
2/2024
Registration Date
28-03-2024
Court
ADJ KISHANGARH TALUKA
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
FIR Details
FIR Number
97
Police Station
Gandhinagar
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state
Adv. BHANWAR VIRENDRA SINGH
Respondent(s)
saeed khan Advocate - PRATEEK MEHTA
sujad khan
Adv. PRATEEK MEHTA
ejaj khan
Adv. PRATEEK MEHTA
wahid
Adv. PRATEEK MEHTA
hayat khan
Adv. PRATEEK MEHTA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | Final arguments |
| 27-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 20-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 16-05-2026 | Final arguments |
| 13-05-2026 | Final arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 2/2024 Outcome: The petition filed under Section 319 CrPC (by injured party Madari Khan) to prosecute Shamsad son of Samad Khan was rejected and dismissed on 05.04.2025. Key Facts: The court examined witness testimonies in an assault case involving a crop-cutting incident. While the complainant and his father alleged Shamsad's involvement in beating, independent witnesses (including injured party Firoz and witnesses Pappu/Sharif and Parba) made no mention of Shamsad's presence or participation in their court statements, despite naming him in their police investigation statements. Reasoning: The court found insufficient credible evidence on record to prosecute Shamsad, as independent and injured witnesses failed to corroborate the allegations during trial. Without solid evidentiary foundation, the petition could not be sustained under Section 319 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 2/2024 Outcome: The petition filed under Section 319 CrPC (by injured party Madari Khan) to prosecute Shamsad son of Samad Khan was rejected and dismissed on 05.04.2025. Key Facts: The court examined witness testimonies in an assault case involving a crop-cutting incident. While the complainant and his father alleged Shamsad's involvement in beating, independent witnesses (including injured party Firoz and witnesses Pappu/Sharif and Parba) made no mention of Shamsad's presence or participation in their court statements, despite naming him in their police investigation statements. Reasoning: The court found insufficient credible evidence on record to prosecute Shamsad, as independent and injured witnesses failed to corroborate the allegations during trial. Without solid evidentiary foundation, the petition could not be sustained under Section 319 CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts