Raju lal vs Dilip Singh — 43/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 163A. Status: Final arguments. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
MACT Main - MACP
CNR: RJAJ170001762019
Filing Number
140/2019
Filing Date
08-Mar-2019
Registration No
43/2019
Registration Date
15-Mar-2019
Court
ADJ KISHANGARH TALUKA
Judge
2-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raju lal
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR DADICH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dilip Singh
-
2.Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
15-May-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
10-Apr-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
13-Mar-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
20-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
13-Feb-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
30-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
14-Jan-2026
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
19-Dec-2025
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
28-Nov-2025
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
07-Nov-2025
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
10-Oct-2025
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
10-Oct-2025
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
18-Sep-2025
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
10-Sep-2025
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
22-Aug-2025
Final arguments
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
18-Jul-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
13-Jun-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
16-May-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
28-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
06-Mar-2025
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 43/2019 - Raju Lal vs. Dilip Singh and Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Outcome: The court dismissed Shriram General Insurance Company's application dated 05.04.2024 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The insurer had requested that the owner and insurance company of vehicle RJ 47 SB 4039 be made parties to the suit, but the court rejected this, holding that the petitioner (Raju Lal), being the driver of vehicle RJ 42 SC 2269, is free to decide whom to implead as defendants in his motor vehicle accident claim under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act. The case is adjourned for evidence on 28.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
01-Mar-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
28-Feb-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
24-Feb-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
21-Feb-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
14-Feb-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
17-Jan-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
10-Jan-2025
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
22-Nov-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
04-Oct-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
02-Aug-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
12-Jul-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
31-May-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
03-May-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
05-Apr-2024
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
15-Mar-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
09-Feb-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
20-Jan-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
19-Jan-2024
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
15-Dec-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
27-Oct-2023
Defendant Evidence
ADJ II
-
29-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ II
-
18-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ II
-
21-Jul-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ II
-
16-Jun-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
ADJ II
-
26-May-2023
Issues
ADJ II
-
21-Apr-2023
Issues
ADJ II
-
24-Mar-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
03-Mar-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
13-Jan-2023
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
25-Nov-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
30-Sep-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
16-Aug-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
13-Aug-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
05-Aug-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
18-Jun-2022
Reply of Application/ Steps by parties
ADJ II
-
06-May-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ II
-
11-Mar-2022
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ II
-
17-Dec-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ II
-
17-Sep-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ II
-
10-Sep-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
25-Jun-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
15-Mar-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
12-Mar-2021
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
04-Dec-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
17-Jul-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
01-May-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
28-Feb-2020
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
29-Nov-2019
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
20-Sep-2019
Awaiting Services of notices/ summons
ADJ
-
28-Jun-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Mar-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 43/2019
Case Summary: 43/2019 - Raju Lal vs. Dilip Singh and Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Outcome: The court dismissed Shriram General Insurance Company's application dated 05.04.2024 under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. The insurer had requested that the owner and insurance company of vehicle RJ 47 SB 4039 be made parties to the suit, but the court rejected this, holding that the petitioner (Raju Lal), being the driver of vehicle RJ 42 SC 2269, is free to decide whom to implead as defendants in his motor vehicle accident claim under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act. The case is adjourned for evidence on 28.03.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts