State vs DURGALAL OTHS Advocate - mukesh gurjar — 616/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354, 341, 323, 451, 34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAJ140009552017

Case disposed

Filing Number

954/2017

Filing Date

30-06-2017

Registration No

616/2017

Registration Date

30-06-2017

Court

ACJM JM Kekri Taluka Criminal

Judge

4-JM

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

579

Police Station

Kekri

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354, 341, 323, 451, 34

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. app

Respondent(s)

DURGALAL OTHS Advocate - mukesh gurjar

Hearing History

Judge: 4-JM

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

07-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

04-02-2026

Prosecution Evidence

30-08-2025

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Judgement

The court acquitted the three accused (Durga Lal, Sukhdeo, and Gopal) under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) due to insufficient evidence, as the victim and key witnesses testified that the accused did not tear clothes or outrage the woman's modesty, contradicting the original complaint. The accused were previously acquitted under Sections 323, 341, and 451 through a compromise settlement. The judgment emphasizes that without witness corroboration of the Section 354 charges, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the three accused (Durga Lal, Sukhdeo, and Gopal) under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) due to insufficient evidence, as the victim and key witnesses testified that the accused did not tear clothes or outrage the woman's modesty, contradicting the original complaint. The accused were previously acquitted under Sections 323, 341, and 451 through a compromise settlement. The judgment emphasizes that without witness corroboration of the Section 354 charges, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM JM Kekri Taluka Criminal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case