State vs DURGALAL OTHS Advocate - mukesh gurjar — 616/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354, 341, 323, 451, 34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAJ140009552017
Filing Number
954/2017
Filing Date
30-06-2017
Registration No
616/2017
Registration Date
30-06-2017
Court
ACJM JM Kekri Taluka Criminal
Judge
4-JM
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
579
Police Station
Kekri
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
DURGALAL OTHS Advocate - mukesh gurjar
Hearing History
Judge: 4-JM
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 07-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 04-02-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 30-08-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the three accused (Durga Lal, Sukhdeo, and Gopal) under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) due to insufficient evidence, as the victim and key witnesses testified that the accused did not tear clothes or outrage the woman's modesty, contradicting the original complaint. The accused were previously acquitted under Sections 323, 341, and 451 through a compromise settlement. The judgment emphasizes that without witness corroboration of the Section 354 charges, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the three accused (Durga Lal, Sukhdeo, and Gopal) under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) due to insufficient evidence, as the victim and key witnesses testified that the accused did not tear clothes or outrage the woman's modesty, contradicting the original complaint. The accused were previously acquitted under Sections 323, 341, and 451 through a compromise settlement. The judgment emphasizes that without witness corroboration of the Section 354 charges, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts