State vs DURGALAL OTHS Advocate - mukesh gurjar — 616/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354, 341, 323, 451, 34. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAJ140009552017

Filing Number

954/2017

Filing Date

30-Jun-2017

Registration No

616/2017

Registration Date

30-Jun-2017

Court

ACJM JM Kekri Taluka Criminal

Judge

4-Jm

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

579

Police Station

Kekri

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 354, 341, 323, 451, 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. app

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DURGALAL OTHS Advocate - mukesh gurjar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The court acquitted the three accused (Durga Lal, Sukhdeo, and Gopal) under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) due to insufficient evidence, as the victim and key witnesses testified that the accused did not tear clothes or outrage the woman's modesty, contradicting the original complaint. The accused were previously acquitted under Sections 323, 341, and 451 through a compromise settlement. The judgment emphasizes that without witness corroboration of the Section 354 charges, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 30-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 05-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 10-Dec-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 22-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 03-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 07-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 23-May-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 11-Oct-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 22-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 12-Jan-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 20-Oct-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 18-Feb-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 14-Jul-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 28-Apr-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 26-Sep-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 08-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  23. 08-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  24. 16-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 13-Aug-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  26. 07-May-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  27. 30-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  28. 29-Jan-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  29. 13-Oct-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm 1

  30. 19-Jul-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 30-Jun-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 616/2017

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the three accused (Durga Lal, Sukhdeo, and Gopal) under IPC Section 354 (outraging modesty) due to insufficient evidence, as the victim and key witnesses testified that the accused did not tear clothes or outrage the woman's modesty, contradicting the original complaint. The accused were previously acquitted under Sections 323, 341, and 451 through a compromise settlement. The judgment emphasizes that without witness corroboration of the Section 354 charges, conviction could not be sustained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case