State vs HANUMAN OTHS — 316/2017

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAJ140005542017

Filing Number

553/2017

Filing Date

24-Mar-2017

Registration No

316/2017

Registration Date

24-Mar-2017

Court

ACJM JM Kekri Taluka Criminal

Judge

4-Jm

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

314

Police Station

Kekri

Year

2016

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HANUMAN OTHS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. HANUMAN OTHS (316/2017) The court acquitted both accused Hanuman and Sohanlal of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and MV Act 146/196, finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Hanuman was driving the van (RJ-26-YP-0536) that caused the accident on 21.05.2016. Although witnesses confirmed a vehicle collision injuring three persons, they could not identify the vehicle number or confirm Hanuman's identity as the driver, and investigative officer testimony was unavailable due to death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jm

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  9. 16-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  13. 06-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  14. 26-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  15. 26-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  16. 18-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  17. 03-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  18. 08-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  19. 18-Jun-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  20. 13-Feb-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  21. 05-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  22. 13-Apr-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  23. 14-Nov-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  24. 30-Apr-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  25. 17-Feb-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  26. 20-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  27. 18-Nov-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  28. 18-Mar-2021

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  29. 04-Aug-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  30. 16-May-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  31. 24-Mar-2020

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  32. 18-Nov-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  33. 30-May-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  34. 24-Jan-2019

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  35. 10-Sep-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Jm

  36. 05-Jun-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  37. 26-Feb-2018

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  38. 21-Nov-2017

    Prosecution Evidence

    Acjm 1

  39. 25-Aug-2017

    Evidence

    Acjm 1

  40. 07-Jun-2017

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 24-Mar-2017

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2017

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. HANUMAN OTHS (316/2017) The court acquitted both accused Hanuman and Sohanlal of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and MV Act 146/196, finding insufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Hanuman was driving the van (RJ-26-YP-0536) that caused the accident on 21.05.2016. Although witnesses confirmed a vehicle collision injuring three persons, they could not identify the vehicle number or confirm Hanuman's identity as the driver, and investigative officer testimony was unavailable due to death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case