State vs raghunath — 247/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR
CNR: RJAJ140004332021
Filing Number
433/2021
Filing Date
23-02-2021
Registration No
247/2021
Registration Date
23-02-2021
Court
ACJM JM Kekri Taluka Criminal
Judge
2-ACJM 1
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
25
Police Station
Kekri
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. app
Respondent(s)
raghunath
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ACJM 1
Disposed
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 20-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 02-12-2025 | Prosecution Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Raghunath Singh (CIS No. 247/2021) The court acquitted Raghunath Singh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) in a fatal traffic accident on January 22, 2020. While the evidence conclusively established that truck number RE 06 JI 5584 caused the accident resulting in the death of Surajnan, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the truck's driver at the time of the incident. The court found that eyewitnesses could not positively identify the accused as the driver, fatally weakening the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Raghunath Singh (CIS No. 247/2021) The court acquitted Raghunath Singh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) in a fatal traffic accident on January 22, 2020. While the evidence conclusively established that truck number RE 06 JI 5584 caused the accident resulting in the death of Surajnan, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the truck's driver at the time of the incident. The court found that eyewitnesses could not positively identify the accused as the driver, fatally weakening the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts