State vs raghunath — 247/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.

Cr. Reg. Case - CR. REGULAR

CNR: RJAJ140004332021

Case disposed

Filing Number

433/2021

Filing Date

23-02-2021

Registration No

247/2021

Registration Date

23-02-2021

Court

ACJM JM Kekri Taluka Criminal

Judge

2-ACJM 1

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

25

Police Station

Kekri

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279

Petitioner(s)

State

Adv. app

Respondent(s)

raghunath

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ACJM 1

25-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

13-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

20-12-2025

Prosecution Evidence

02-12-2025

Prosecution Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: State v. Raghunath Singh (CIS No. 247/2021) The court acquitted Raghunath Singh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) in a fatal traffic accident on January 22, 2020. While the evidence conclusively established that truck number RE 06 JI 5584 caused the accident resulting in the death of Surajnan, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the truck's driver at the time of the incident. The court found that eyewitnesses could not positively identify the accused as the driver, fatally weakening the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Raghunath Singh (CIS No. 247/2021) The court acquitted Raghunath Singh of charges under IPC Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304A (causing death by negligence) in a fatal traffic accident on January 22, 2020. While the evidence conclusively established that truck number RE 06 JI 5584 caused the accident resulting in the death of Surajnan, the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the truck's driver at the time of the incident. The court found that eyewitnesses could not positively identify the accused as the driver, fatally weakening the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ACJM JM Kekri Taluka Criminal All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case