State vs RESMISING Advocate - Mohd. Hussain HP — 11/2019
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section US 8/15. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 04th April 2026.
NDPS. S. CASE
CNR: RJAJ130007732017
Filing Number
165/2017
Filing Date
25-12-2017
Registration No
11/2019
Registration Date
21-08-2017
Court
ADJ Kekri Taluka
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
04th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
61
Police Station
SARWAR
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. Additional Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
RESMISING Advocate - Mohd. Hussain HP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 28-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 25-03-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY: Case 11/2019 — State v. RESMISING Advocate Mohd. Hussain HP Court Decision (April 4, 2026): The court acquitted three accused—Hemraj (Hema), Udaylal, and Jorasingh—of charges under NDPS Act Sections 8/25 and 8/29. One accused, Reshmi Singh, died during trial (November 21, 2022), terminating proceedings against him. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing procedural deficiencies including lack of independent witness corroboration, failure to follow Section 52A NDPS compliance, and material evidence substitution during inventory proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: Case 11/2019 — State v. RESMISING Advocate Mohd. Hussain HP Court Decision (April 4, 2026): The court acquitted three accused—Hemraj (Hema), Udaylal, and Jorasingh—of charges under NDPS Act Sections 8/25 and 8/29. One accused, Reshmi Singh, died during trial (November 21, 2022), terminating proceedings against him. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, citing procedural deficiencies including lack of independent witness corroboration, failure to follow Section 52A NDPS compliance, and material evidence substitution during inventory proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts