VIKASH KUMAR vs KARUN TANK — 19/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section US O 37 R 1,2. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 11th May 2026.
Civil Suit
CNR: RJAJ130005332019
Filing Number
470/2019
Filing Date
06-09-2019
Registration No
19/2019
Registration Date
03-09-2019
Court
ADJ Kekri Taluka
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VIKASH KUMAR
Adv. SAHLENDRA SINGH RATHOR
Respondent(s)
KARUN TANK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Disposed
Judgment
Final arguments
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 30-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 27-04-2026 | Final arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Vikash Kumar v. Karun Tank (Case 19/2019) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge decreed the plaintiff's suit in full, ordering the defendant to pay ₹5,00,000 (principal loan) plus ₹1,25,000 (interest at 12% p.a. from June 2017 to July 2019) within three months of the judgment date. Key Reasoning: The court found credible evidence—including bank statements and witness testimony—establishing that the plaintiff loaned ₹5 lakh to the defendant on 06-06-2014 at 12% annual interest for three years. Though the defendant claimed he had lent money to the plaintiff instead, he provided no documentary proof, only vague oral assertions. The court also rejected the defendant's limitation and notice-service objections, finding the suit timely filed (within three years of June 2017 when repayment fell due) and the legal notice properly served at the registered address. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Vikash Kumar v. Karun Tank (Case 19/2019) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge decreed the plaintiff's suit in full, ordering the defendant to pay ₹5,00,000 (principal loan) plus ₹1,25,000 (interest at 12% p.a. from June 2017 to July 2019) within three months of the judgment date. Key Reasoning: The court found credible evidence—including bank statements and witness testimony—establishing that the plaintiff loaned ₹5 lakh to the defendant on 06-06-2014 at 12% annual interest for three years. Though the defendant claimed he had lent money to the plaintiff instead, he provided no documentary proof, only vague oral assertions. The court also rejected the defendant's limitation and notice-service objections, finding the suit timely filed (within three years of June 2017 when repayment fell due) and the legal notice properly served at the registered address. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts