STATE vs MAHAVEER ETC — 4/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.

Session Case

CNR: RJAJ130000902024

Case disposed

Filing Number

38/2024

Filing Date

23-01-2024

Registration No

4/2024

Registration Date

23-01-2024

Court

ADJ Kekri Taluka

Judge

1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

174

Police Station

Sawar

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,201

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

MAHAVEER ETC

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

10-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Judgment

13-03-2026

Judgment

17-02-2026

Final arguments

05-02-2026

Final arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
Copy of document.

Case Summary: State v. Mahaveer (Session Case 04/2024) Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused - Kanhaiyal (age 30) and Mahavir (age 42) - of charges under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 201 (tampering with evidence). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the accused's confessional statements under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act led to recovery of a wooden stick and other materials, the FSL (forensic) report was negative, with no conclusive evidence linking the recovered items to the victim's death. Testimony from key prosecution witnesses contradicted the murder narrative, with multiple witnesses testifying the victim (Kailash) died from falling while intoxicated. The court found the Section 27 evidence insufficient and lacking corroboration from other evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Mahaveer (Session Case 04/2024) Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused - Kanhaiyal (age 30) and Mahavir (age 42) - of charges under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 201 (tampering with evidence). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the accused's confessional statements under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act led to recovery of a wooden stick and other materials, the FSL (forensic) report was negative, with no conclusive evidence linking the recovered items to the victim's death. Testimony from key prosecution witnesses contradicted the murder narrative, with multiple witnesses testifying the victim (Kailash) died from falling while intoxicated. The court found the Section 27 evidence insufficient and lacking corroboration from other evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADJ Kekri Taluka All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case