STATE vs MAHAVEER ETC — 4/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,201. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 10th April 2026.
Session Case
CNR: RJAJ130000902024
Filing Number
38/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
23-01-2024
Court
ADJ Kekri Taluka
Judge
1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Decision Date
10th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
174
Police Station
Sawar
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
MAHAVEER ETC
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl District and Sessions Judge I
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Final arguments
Final arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 17-02-2026 | Final arguments |
| 05-02-2026 | Final arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Mahaveer (Session Case 04/2024) Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused - Kanhaiyal (age 30) and Mahavir (age 42) - of charges under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 201 (tampering with evidence). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the accused's confessional statements under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act led to recovery of a wooden stick and other materials, the FSL (forensic) report was negative, with no conclusive evidence linking the recovered items to the victim's death. Testimony from key prosecution witnesses contradicted the murder narrative, with multiple witnesses testifying the victim (Kailash) died from falling while intoxicated. The court found the Section 27 evidence insufficient and lacking corroboration from other evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Mahaveer (Session Case 04/2024) Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused - Kanhaiyal (age 30) and Mahavir (age 42) - of charges under IPC Sections 302 (murder) and 201 (tampering with evidence). Key Reasoning: The prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. While the accused's confessional statements under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act led to recovery of a wooden stick and other materials, the FSL (forensic) report was negative, with no conclusive evidence linking the recovered items to the victim's death. Testimony from key prosecution witnesses contradicted the murder narrative, with multiple witnesses testifying the victim (Kailash) died from falling while intoxicated. The court found the Section 27 evidence insufficient and lacking corroboration from other evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts