RISHIRAJ SHARMA vs State — 557/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 09th May 2026.
Cr. Appeal
CNR: RJAJ010044602025
Filing Number
3266/2025
Filing Date
11-12-2025
Registration No
557/2025
Registration Date
12-12-2025
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Settled by ADR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RISHIRAJ SHARMA
Adv. Mukesh Sharma 2
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 13-03-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
| 30-01-2026 | Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 557/2025 The Session Court of Ajmer set aside the conviction of Rishiraj Sharma under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of a settlement between the appellant and the complainant (Mr. Beverage). The court found that both parties had reached a compromise through the Lok Adalat process, with the complainant confirming receipt of the full amount mentioned in the disputed cheque, and no remaining dispute existed between them. The appellant was acquitted and discharged from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 557/2025 The Session Court of Ajmer set aside the conviction of Rishiraj Sharma under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of a settlement between the appellant and the complainant (Mr. Beverage). The court found that both parties had reached a compromise through the Lok Adalat process, with the complainant confirming receipt of the full amount mentioned in the disputed cheque, and no remaining dispute existed between them. The appellant was acquitted and discharged from custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts