RISHIRAJ SHARMA vs State — 559/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 09th May 2026.

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJAJ010044592025

Case disposed

Filing Number

3265/2025

Filing Date

11-12-2025

Registration No

559/2025

Registration Date

12-12-2025

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled by ADR

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

RISHIRAJ SHARMA

Adv. Mukesh Sharma 2

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

09-05-2026

Disposed

10-04-2026

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

13-03-2026

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

30-01-2026

Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

Interim Orders

10-04-2026
Judgement/Order

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 559/2025 The Session Court in Ajmer quashed the conviction of Rishiraj Sharma under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of a settlement reached through lok adalat (public arbitration). The appellant was originally convicted on November 13, 2024, by the Judicial Magistrate for a cheque-related offense, but both the appellant and the complainant (Sri Beverage) voluntarily agreed to resolve the dispute, confirming that the disputed cheque amount had been fully paid and no transaction remained pending between them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 559/2025 The Session Court in Ajmer quashed the conviction of Rishiraj Sharma under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of a settlement reached through lok adalat (public arbitration). The appellant was originally convicted on November 13, 2024, by the Judicial Magistrate for a cheque-related offense, but both the appellant and the complainant (Sri Beverage) voluntarily agreed to resolve the dispute, confirming that the disputed cheque amount had been fully paid and no transaction remained pending between them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case