RISHIRAJ SHARMA vs State — 559/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--Settled by ADR on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cr. Appeal

CNR: RJAJ010044592025

Filing Number

3265/2025

Filing Date

11-Dec-2025

Registration No

559/2025

Registration Date

12-Dec-2025

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Settled by ADR

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RISHIRAJ SHARMA

    Adv. Mukesh Sharma 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement/OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 559/2025 The Session Court in Ajmer quashed the conviction of Rishiraj Sharma under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of a settlement reached through lok adalat (public arbitration). The appellant was originally convicted on November 13, 2024, by the Judicial Magistrate for a cheque-related offense, but both the appellant and the complainant (Sri Beverage) voluntarily agreed to resolve the dispute, confirming that the disputed cheque amount had been fully paid and no transaction remained pending between them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Cognizance / issuance of Process/ Service

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 559/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Appeal 559/2025 The Session Court in Ajmer quashed the conviction of Rishiraj Sharma under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the basis of a settlement reached through lok adalat (public arbitration). The appellant was originally convicted on November 13, 2024, by the Judicial Magistrate for a cheque-related offense, but both the appellant and the complainant (Sri Beverage) voluntarily agreed to resolve the dispute, confirming that the disputed cheque amount had been fully paid and no transaction remained pending between them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case