State vs Kalu urf raju — 112/2025

Case under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 79. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Session Case

CNR: RJAJ010013602025

Filing Number

1015/2025

Filing Date

25-Apr-2025

Registration No

112/2025

Registration Date

25-Apr-2025

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

20

Police Station

Adarsh Nagar

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 79
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 146
Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act Section 3/14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

    Adv. Ram Ratan Gurjar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kalu urf raju

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Final arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Examination of accused u/s. 313 Cr.P.C.

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    OrderView PDF

    The court accepted the Public Prosecutor's application under Section 94 of the CrPC to place a CD/video recording of child labor on record as crucial evidence. The court rejected the accused's arguments regarding delay and procedural defects, finding the videographic evidence essential for a just decision in the case. The witness (investigation officer Shilu Kumar) was summoned for 27.11.2025 for examination and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 16-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 12-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 15-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 30-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 17-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 16-Jun-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 28-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 27-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 26-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 12-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 25-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court accepted the Public Prosecutor's application under Section 94 of the CrPC to place a CD/video recording of child labor on record as crucial evidence. The court rejected the accused's arguments regarding delay and procedural defects, finding the videographic evidence essential for a just decision in the case. The witness (investigation officer Shilu Kumar) was summoned for 27.11.2025 for examination and cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case