PARMESH vs State — 276/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010009862026

Filing Number

709/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

276/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

Pushkar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMESH

    Adv. ROHIT TAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 276/2026 - Parmesh v. State Decision: The court GRANTED bail to petitioner Parmesh in a case involving illegal mineral extraction. The Session Judge of Ajmer found that while serious charges under IPC Section 303(2) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 were registered (for transporting approximately 10 cubic meters of mineral aggregate without valid license on 19.01.2026), bail was justified given the absence of prior criminal history, no remaining recovery, and no charges warranting life imprisonment or death penalty. Conditions: Bail granted upon furnishing a bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each, to the satisfaction of the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 276/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 276/2026 - Parmesh v. State Decision: The court GRANTED bail to petitioner Parmesh in a case involving illegal mineral extraction. The Session Judge of Ajmer found that while serious charges under IPC Section 303(2) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 were registered (for transporting approximately 10 cubic meters of mineral aggregate without valid license on 19.01.2026), bail was justified given the absence of prior criminal history, no remaining recovery, and no charges warranting life imprisonment or death penalty. Conditions: Bail granted upon furnishing a bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each, to the satisfaction of the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case