PARMESH vs State — 276/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ010009862026
Filing Number
709/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
276/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed / Granted after Full Trial / Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Pushkar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PARMESH
Adv. ROHIT TAK
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 276/2026 - Parmesh v. State Decision: The court GRANTED bail to petitioner Parmesh in a case involving illegal mineral extraction. The Session Judge of Ajmer found that while serious charges under IPC Section 303(2) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 were registered (for transporting approximately 10 cubic meters of mineral aggregate without valid license on 19.01.2026), bail was justified given the absence of prior criminal history, no remaining recovery, and no charges warranting life imprisonment or death penalty. Conditions: Bail granted upon furnishing a bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each, to the satisfaction of the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 276/2026 - Parmesh v. State Decision: The court GRANTED bail to petitioner Parmesh in a case involving illegal mineral extraction. The Session Judge of Ajmer found that while serious charges under IPC Section 303(2) and MMDR Act Section 4/21 were registered (for transporting approximately 10 cubic meters of mineral aggregate without valid license on 19.01.2026), bail was justified given the absence of prior criminal history, no remaining recovery, and no charges warranting life imprisonment or death penalty. Conditions: Bail granted upon furnishing a bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of ₹25,000 each, to the satisfaction of the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts