parmveer soni vs State — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010009822026

Filing Number

707/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

97

Police Station

Hari Bhau Upadhyaya

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.parmveer soni

    Adv. Krishan Gopal Khatri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 275/2026 - Parmveer Soni v. State Decision: The Additional Session Judge rejected Parmveer Soni's bail application on March 19, 2026. The court found substantial evidence that the petitioner, along with co-accused, committed serious assault in a land dispute, causing grievous injuries including amputation of the victim's limb. Given the severity of charges under BNS sections 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 324(4)(5), 189(2), 111(2), and 61(2), the court determined bail was not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge II

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge II

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge II

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 275/2026 - Parmveer Soni v. State Decision: The Additional Session Judge rejected Parmveer Soni's bail application on March 19, 2026. The court found substantial evidence that the petitioner, along with co-accused, committed serious assault in a land dispute, causing grievous injuries including amputation of the victim's limb. Given the severity of charges under BNS sections 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 324(4)(5), 189(2), 111(2), and 61(2), the court determined bail was not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case