DEVI SINGH vs State — 274/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010009732026

Filing Number

700/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

274/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

104

Police Station

Kotwali

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVI SINGH

    Adv. Shivang Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case 274/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Ajmer rejected Devi Singh's bail application under Section 483 CrPC. Singh was accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust (Sections 420, 409, 120B IPC) by defrauding a complainant of ₹6,27,162 through various investment schemes. The court found the charges serious in nature and noted Singh's prior criminal history (two previous cases under similar sections), holding that bail was not justified without commenting on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge II

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 274/2026 Summary: The Additional Sessions Court, Ajmer rejected Devi Singh's bail application under Section 483 CrPC. Singh was accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust (Sections 420, 409, 120B IPC) by defrauding a complainant of ₹6,27,162 through various investment schemes. The court found the charges serious in nature and noted Singh's prior criminal history (two previous cases under similar sections), holding that bail was not justified without commenting on the case merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case