MOHAN RAO KADAM vs PUSHPA JAJU — 27/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O43R1. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 16th April 2026.
Civil Misc. Appeal - CIVIL MISC APPEAL
CNR: RJAJ010009692026
Filing Number
272/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
27/2026
Registration Date
13-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
4-Addl District and Sessions Judge III
Decision Date
16th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAN RAO KADAM
Adv. Ashok Kumar Mathur
CHHAYA DEVI
Respondent(s)
PUSHPA JAJU
PRATEEK JAJU
SUNNY JAJU
Hearing History
Judge: 4-Addl District and Sessions Judge III
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 15-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by Mohan Rao Kadam and Chhaya Devi against the respondents' alleged illegal construction on an adjacent property. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of the temporary injunction petition, finding that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case, had alternative remedies available through municipal authorities, and themselves violated their approved construction plan by adding windows and doors toward the respondents' plot. The court reasoned that the appellants lacked clean hands and must comply with principles of equity before seeking court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by Mohan Rao Kadam and Chhaya Devi against the respondents' alleged illegal construction on an adjacent property. The court upheld the trial court's rejection of the temporary injunction petition, finding that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case, had alternative remedies available through municipal authorities, and themselves violated their approved construction plan by adding windows and doors toward the respondents' plot. The court reasoned that the appellants lacked clean hands and must comply with principles of equity before seeking court intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts