kailashchand vs State — 272/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 19th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ010009682026
Filing Number
698/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
272/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
5-Additional District and Session Judge IV
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Granted
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
241
Police Station
Ramganj
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.kailashchand
Adv. Pawan Kumar Panchal
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: 272/2026 - Kailashchand v. State Kailashchand's bail application was GRANTED by the Additional District and Sessions Judge on March 19, 2026. The applicant was accused of forged property registration and document fraud involving agricultural land in Ajmer, with charges under IPC sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2)(3), 338, 340(2), and 61(2). The court approved bail on self-bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each, noting that a co-accused obtained bail from the High Court under similar circumstances and finding insufficient grounds to detain the applicant pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Session Judge IV
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Additional District and Session Judge IV
-
16-Mar-2026
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Additional District and Session Judge IV
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 272/2026
CASE SUMMARY: 272/2026 - Kailashchand v. State Kailashchand's bail application was GRANTED by the Additional District and Sessions Judge on March 19, 2026. The applicant was accused of forged property registration and document fraud involving agricultural land in Ajmer, with charges under IPC sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2)(3), 338, 340(2), and 61(2). The court approved bail on self-bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of ₹25,000 each, noting that a co-accused obtained bail from the High Court under similar circumstances and finding insufficient grounds to detain the applicant pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts