Sunita vs State — 271/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 17th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010009572026

Case disposed

Filing Number

687/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

271/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

Ramganj

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Sunita

Adv. Ajay Kumar Verma 1

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

13-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

12-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order
17-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: 271/2026 (Sunita v. State) Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's order rejecting the FIR (No. 289/2015) under Section 203 Cr.P.C., dismissing Sunita's revision petition dated 17 March 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to establish that accused Somnath committed robbery on 6 December 2015, noting critical gaps including lack of eyewitness testimony at the crime scene, contradictions in witness statements, absence of forensic evidence linking the accused, and failure to establish custody of stolen items connecting the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 271/2026 (Sunita v. State) Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's order rejecting the FIR (No. 289/2015) under Section 203 Cr.P.C., dismissing Sunita's revision petition dated 17 March 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to establish that accused Somnath committed robbery on 6 December 2015, noting critical gaps including lack of eyewitness testimony at the crime scene, contradictions in witness statements, absence of forensic evidence linking the accused, and failure to establish custody of stolen items connecting the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case