Sunita vs State — 271/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010009572026

Filing Number

687/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

271/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

2-Addl District and Sessions Judge I

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

45

Police Station

Ramganj

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunita

    Adv. Ajay Kumar Verma 1

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 271/2026 (Sunita v. State) Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's order rejecting the FIR (No. 289/2015) under Section 203 Cr.P.C., dismissing Sunita's revision petition dated 17 March 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to establish that accused Somnath committed robbery on 6 December 2015, noting critical gaps including lack of eyewitness testimony at the crime scene, contradictions in witness statements, absence of forensic evidence linking the accused, and failure to establish custody of stolen items connecting the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge I

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 271/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 271/2026 (Sunita v. State) Court Decision: The Additional District and Sessions Judge upheld the lower court's order rejecting the FIR (No. 289/2015) under Section 203 Cr.P.C., dismissing Sunita's revision petition dated 17 March 2026. The court found insufficient evidence to establish that accused Somnath committed robbery on 6 December 2015, noting critical gaps including lack of eyewitness testimony at the crime scene, contradictions in witness statements, absence of forensic evidence linking the accused, and failure to establish custody of stolen items connecting the accused to the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case