SHAITAN SINGH vs State — 269/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 13th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010009432026

Case disposed

Filing Number

677/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

269/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Refused

FIR Details

FIR Number

102

Police Station

Kotwali

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

SHAITAN SINGH

Adv. Manish Kumar Khandelwal

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order

Case Summary: 269/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Ajmer, rejected Shaitan Singh's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita on March 13, 2026. The court found that Singh faced serious charges under Sections 420, 409, and 120-B IPC for allegedly defrauding an investor (Kiran Rathod) of ₹18,75,674 through fraudulent investment schemes, coupled with his prior criminal history (cases from 2010 and 2022). Given the grave nature of the offenses and circumstances, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 269/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge, Ajmer, rejected Shaitan Singh's bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita on March 13, 2026. The court found that Singh faced serious charges under Sections 420, 409, and 120-B IPC for allegedly defrauding an investor (Kiran Rathod) of ₹18,75,674 through fraudulent investment schemes, coupled with his prior criminal history (cases from 2010 and 2022). Given the grave nature of the offenses and circumstances, the court deemed bail inappropriate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case