SHAITAN SINGH vs State — 268/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Refused on 13th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ010009422026
Filing Number
676/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
268/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
3-Addl District and Sessions Judge II
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail Refused
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
104
Police Station
Kotwali
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAITAN SINGH
Adv. Manish Kumar Khandelwal
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case 268/2026: SHAITAN SINGH v. State — Bail Rejection Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Shaitan Singh's bail application filed under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 13, 2026. Key Reasoning: Singh faced serious charges under Sections 420, 409, and 120-B IPC for cheating and criminal breach of trust involving a savings scheme. The complainant alleged Singh and other society members fraudulently induced him to invest ₹6,27,162 in various deposit schemes, then misappropriated the funds by closing the office. Singh had prior criminal cases (2010, 2022) involving similar offenses. The court found the charges serious in nature and concluded that bail was not justified given the gravity of the allegations and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl District and Sessions Judge II
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 268/2026
Case 268/2026: SHAITAN SINGH v. State — Bail Rejection Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge rejected Shaitan Singh's bail application filed under Section 483 of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure on March 13, 2026. Key Reasoning: Singh faced serious charges under Sections 420, 409, and 120-B IPC for cheating and criminal breach of trust involving a savings scheme. The complainant alleged Singh and other society members fraudulently induced him to invest ₹6,27,162 in various deposit schemes, then misappropriated the funds by closing the office. Singh had prior criminal cases (2010, 2022) involving similar offenses. The court found the charges serious in nature and concluded that bail was not justified given the gravity of the allegations and circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts