KISHAN LAL vs State — 247/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Bail Granted on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010008292026

Filing Number

585/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

247/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

4-Addl District and Sessions Judge III

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail Granted

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KISHAN LAL

    Adv. Ashok Tiwari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional Session Court (Judge Neeraj Gupta) granted bail to Kishanlal, accused of cheating under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, after his earlier bail was cancelled for non-appearance. The court found that the accused's absence was due to illness rather than wilful non-compliance, and since the trial was still in evidence stage, detention was unjustified. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Session Court (Judge Neeraj Gupta) granted bail to Kishanlal, accused of cheating under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, after his earlier bail was cancelled for non-appearance. The court found that the accused's absence was due to illness rather than wilful non-compliance, and since the trial was still in evidence stage, detention was unjustified. Bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions including regular court attendance and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case