SURENDRA CHOUDHARY vs State — 245/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ010008112026
Filing Number
568/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
245/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
357
Police Station
Krishnaganj
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURENDRA CHOUDHARY
Adv. Parmeshwar Choudhary
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
| 07-03-2026 | Arguments on Applications / Bail Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 245/2026 | Surendra Chaudhari v. State of Rajasthan | Ajmer Session Court (12.03.2026) Decision: The court rejected the bail application of Surendra Chaudhari under Section 483 of the Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). Key Reasoning: The applicant was accused of armed robbery of ₹23,39,000 along with co-accused persons on 03.12.2025 near Prem Prakash Ashram, Ajmer. Although co-accused Khusisram and Rajesh obtained bail from the High Court, the court found Surendra's case distinguishable because he was identified by the complainant during formal identification proceedings at the Central Jail on 18.12.2025. Considering the serious nature of dacoity offences, the large amount robbed, and rising crime trends, the court deemed bail unsuitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 245/2026 | Surendra Chaudhari v. State of Rajasthan | Ajmer Session Court (12.03.2026) Decision: The court rejected the bail application of Surendra Chaudhari under Section 483 of the Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita). Key Reasoning: The applicant was accused of armed robbery of ₹23,39,000 along with co-accused persons on 03.12.2025 near Prem Prakash Ashram, Ajmer. Although co-accused Khusisram and Rajesh obtained bail from the High Court, the court found Surendra's case distinguishable because he was identified by the complainant during formal identification proceedings at the Central Jail on 18.12.2025. Considering the serious nature of dacoity offences, the large amount robbed, and rising crime trends, the court deemed bail unsuitable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts