HEMLATA vs DUSHYANT KUMAR MISHRA Advocate - Avinash Tanwar — 44/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 28th April 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

Civil Suit

CNR: RJAJ010008022024

Filing Number

218/2024

Filing Date

27-Feb-2024

Registration No

44/2024

Registration Date

28-Feb-2024

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

4-Addl District and Sessions Judge III

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMLATA

    Adv. Chandra Prakash Sharma 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DUSHYANT KUMAR MISHRA Advocate - Avinash Tanwar

  2. 2.bharat mishra

    Adv. Avinash Tanwar

  3. 3.tarun khanna

    Adv. Pankaj Jain

  4. 4.up panjiyan first

    Adv. Additional Proceucation Officer

  5. 5.state

    Adv. Additional Proceucation Officer

Case History

  1. 28-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  6. 03-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  7. 20-Aug-2025

    Issues

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  8. 22-May-2025

    Issues

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  9. 25-Apr-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  10. 29-Mar-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  11. 17-Mar-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Court Order Summary The petition filed by defendants No. 1 and 2 under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC challenging the adequacy of court fees has been dismissed as lacking merit. The court found that the plaintiff, not being a party to the disputed will (dated 16-11-1982) and gift deed (dated 08-11-2021), correctly paid court fees under Section 24(d) of the Rajasthan Court Fees and Valuation Act, 1961. The case is adjourned to 29-03-2025 for filing the reply to the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 17-Mar-2025

    Reply of Application/ Steps by parties

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  13. 27-Feb-2025

    Orders

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  14. 13-Feb-2025

    Orders

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  15. 13-Dec-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  16. 21-Nov-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  17. 15-Oct-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  18. 21-Sep-2024

    Arguments on Applications / Arguments in Misc. Proceedings

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  19. 28-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  20. 01-Aug-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  21. 16-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  22. 05-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  23. 07-May-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  24. 12-Apr-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  25. 27-Mar-2024

    Written Statement

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  26. 19-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Services of notices/ summons

    Addl District and Sessions Judge III

  27. 28-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 27-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary The petition filed by defendants No. 1 and 2 under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC challenging the adequacy of court fees has been dismissed as lacking merit. The court found that the plaintiff, not being a party to the disputed will (dated 16-11-1982) and gift deed (dated 08-11-2021), correctly paid court fees under Section 24(d) of the Rajasthan Court Fees and Valuation Act, 1961. The case is adjourned to 29-03-2025 for filing the reply to the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case