KULDEEP BANJARA vs State — 234/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: RJAJ010007692026

Filing Number

530/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

234/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing

Last updated 02-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

108

Police Station

Clock tower

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP BANJARA

    Adv. Kailash Chand Sunariwal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Ajmer Session Court (Judge Vikrant Gupta) rejected bail applications filed by Kuldeep Banjara and Kamlesh Banjara under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the accused are charged with serious fraud offenses under IPC Sections 318(4), 316(2), and 61(2) for defrauding the public through illegal betting schemes (BC operations), with 15 similar criminal cases already registered against them, demonstrating a criminal pattern that warrants denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Compliance

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 234/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Ajmer Session Court (Judge Vikrant Gupta) rejected bail applications filed by Kuldeep Banjara and Kamlesh Banjara under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the accused are charged with serious fraud offenses under IPC Sections 318(4), 316(2), and 61(2) for defrauding the public through illegal betting schemes (BC operations), with 15 similar criminal cases already registered against them, demonstrating a criminal pattern that warrants denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case