KULDEEP BANJARA vs State — 233/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: RJAJ010007682026
Filing Number
529/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
233/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
DJ ADJ Ajmer District HQ
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed after Full Trial/Hearing
FIR Details
FIR Number
111
Police Station
Clock tower
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KULDEEP BANJARA
Adv. Kailash Chand Sunariwal
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 07-03-2026 | Compliance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Ajmer Session Court rejected bail petitions filed by Kuldeep Banjara and Kamlesh Banjara under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the accused were involved in a criminal conspiracy to defraud multiple people through an illegal "BC" (business correspondent) scheme, fraudulently collecting approximately ₹7.5 lakh from complainant Yogesh Singh and similar amounts from others between 2016-2025, with chargesheet already filed under IPC Sections 318(4), 316(2), and 61(2). The court considered the serious nature of the offenses, the accused's criminal background (15 similar criminal cases pending), and the pattern of fraudulent activities as grounds to deny bail at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Ajmer Session Court rejected bail petitions filed by Kuldeep Banjara and Kamlesh Banjara under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that the accused were involved in a criminal conspiracy to defraud multiple people through an illegal "BC" (business correspondent) scheme, fraudulently collecting approximately ₹7.5 lakh from complainant Yogesh Singh and similar amounts from others between 2016-2025, with chargesheet already filed under IPC Sections 318(4), 316(2), and 61(2). The court considered the serious nature of the offenses, the accused's criminal background (15 similar criminal cases pending), and the pattern of fraudulent activities as grounds to deny bail at this stage of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts